|
I profited by my
participation on two expeditions organised by
the Association for the Burkinabe Idi du Sahel
or ABIS) in 1996 and 1997 to the regions of
origin of the Azawakh breed (Mali, Niger and
Burkina Faso), in order to take note of every
Azawakh met of the place it was seen, and of its
sex, type, colour and, when present,
peculiarities. The following report deals mainly
with observed varieties in colour and coat
design, as well as with the size of white
markings. The chart 1 contains the statistical
values for all of the varieties found, and gives
the percentages accordingly.
TAB.1: Division according to coat color,
design and markings
|
colors |
1996 |
1997 |
2000 |
Tot. |
% |
|
red |
101 |
73 |
87 |
261 |
44,84 |
|
sand |
63 |
50 |
82 |
195 |
33,51 |
|
brindle |
25 |
31 |
25 |
81 |
13,92 |
|
pied |
9 |
9 |
14 |
32 |
4,50 |
|
blu |
1 |
-
|
-
|
1 |
0,17 |
|
black |
1 |
-
|
-
|
1 |
0,17 |
|
cream |
3 |
1 |
4 |
8 |
1,37 |
|
silver |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0,52 |
|
Tot. |
204 |
165 |
213 |
582 |
100 |
It is clear that the data and
statistics refer to a sample of the total
population and consequently do not allow any
definitive statements to be made as far as the
exact numerical representation of each coat
colour is concerned. Besides this fact, we
weren't able to visit some areas of the
countries of origin, and our time was very
limited, thus precluding any further research.
Moreover, some of the rare specimens met during
both of the two expeditions may have been
considered twice. It is, however, possible to
underline significant differences in the
quantitative division of colours.
TAB.2: types of colours and patterns recorded
in 1996, 1997 and 2000
|
pattern |
number |
% |
|
Black mask |
56 |
9,62 |
|
Grizzle |
28 |
4,81 |
|
Black saddle |
24 |
4,12 |
|
Blu nuances |
14 |
2,41 |
|
Blaze |
75 |
12,89 |
|
Irish marked |
35 |
6,01 |
If we take into account that
the colours and design recognised by the FCI
standard are red, sand and, since 1994 brindled,
we can appreciate that there are certainly more
colours than just those spread throughout the
world. We can not hide the existence of these
other colours, even if they are the less common
ones, as our report represents.
Francis Roussel affirmed the
presence of black and brindled specimens in his
1975 thesis, "Study on the South-Sahara
Sighthound". Ursula Arnold quotes the
percentages of brindled (6%), black (2%) and
chocolate (3%) specimens met during her travels
in 1984, 1987 and 1988 in her article "The
Azawakh in its Country of Origin", in the
magazine "Unsere Windhunde" (February', 1989).
Similarly, in "Der Azawakh
Windhund der Nomaden in Mali" (The Azawakh: the
Nomads' Sighthound in Mali) by Strassner and
Eiles, there are 50 photos taken during their
trips between 1986 and 1987 in the Azawakh
Valley, between Menaka and Anderamboukane. Among
them, there are five photos portraying pied
specimens, one representing a cream dog and four
showing black-coated dogs.
Such a collection of
distinctly different publications witnesses the
presence of a variety of colours in the dog's
coat besides the most traditional ones listed in
the Standard, and the colours which are less
common still represent the same phenotype of
red, sand and cream Azawakhs.
Such specimens have, in fact,
been detected in all the regions we visited,
namely: Niger; Dalol Bosso between Banibangou
and Tera, where the dogs are owned by the
settled Haussa; Mali; the Azawakh Valley,
between Menaka and Anderamboukane; as well as in
the areas surrounding Ansongo and Gurma, by the
Tuaregs camps. In each of these countries we
found no differences in the percentage of coat
colours. This data basically runs counter to the
thesis, otherwise spread so widely in Europe,
that colours which are not mentioned in the
Standard might belong only to specimens living
on the threshold of the actual breed, and thus
signify mongrel blood.
A set criterion should be
followed to distinguish on a more scientific
basis the range of colours found in the Azawakh,
as some of the specimens catalogued as red, sand
and brindled show a saddle covered with black
hair, more or less solid, and some with even a
full black coat.
I have known many specimens
coming from pure-bred European bloodlines who,
once adult, showed a classic red coat even
though they had been bi-colour when puppies,
with a black saddle spread on a large part of
the body, and who had shown no traces of sand or
dark colour but for on the legs, under the tail
and on the muzzle. In a matter of a few weeks,
the bi-colour coat disappeared and left no
traces other than a few dark hairs. In Mexico,
in a litter coming from various ancestors (among
which were a sand bitch imported from Mali, a
red dog coming from Burkina Faso and a red dog
coming from Yugoslavia), many of the specimens
kept their black coat through adulthood. Such
specimens, as well as those who did not keep a
black coat beyond the puppy phase, are
genetically catalogued among the "agouti' or 'W'
series.
We should also add to the
range of existing colours from those found on
Azawakhs with blue nuances, blue noses and light
eyes, and "grizzled" decoration on the head,
legs, breast, and under the tail. Such
decorations are, above all, present in the
specimens classified as red, and are even more
evident in the young puppies. The contrast of
colours in this type of coat is attenuated
untill it disappears during the growth. In some
fifteen recorded dogs, however, such decoration
can still be recognised in adults.
Among these, two of the
specimens also show brindling. Azawakhs whose
coat had the same colour as that of a Weimaraner
were classified as silver in Table 1, and
exhibited a pattern which could be defined as
grizzle dilute red. In those specimens defined
as "cream" it is in fact a diluted red colour;
the lips, eyes and eyelids are very much less
pigmented. One of the specimens classified as
cream in our statistics also showed blue
brindling.
Almost all of the specimens
seen showed, as required by the F.C.I. standard,
white spots on the legs, breast and tail. Two
red Azawakhs had only a star on the breast. One
red bitch had a white tip on the tail.
Conversely, the white markings on the neck and
collars were much more frequent than what we are
used to seeing in Europe. We had the chance to
see, more than once, white markings which
reached the shoulder and the nape of the neck.
Such variety in the distribution of white
markings can be genetically explained by four
alleles:
S
surface is totally pigmented;
Si
white markings are limited to the muzzle,
forehead, breast, stomach, legs, and tip of the
tail;
Sp
pied;
Sw
pied with a predominance of
white.
The Si allele is certainly
the most commonly expressed allele in the
Azawakh population, but we should not deny that
Sp and Sw are an integrative part of the genetic
pool of the breed, as this would explain how we
took note of 18 pied specimens. Two of the
specimens did not show pigmentation except on
the head, eyelids and ears, and undoubtedly were
carriers of the Sw allele with a predominance of
white. It is impossible to develop in the space
of one article the genetic heritage of white
markings and we will consequently limit our
study to the following descriptive diagram.
It is evident that the
current standard, which requires white markings
on the legs, breast and tail, and penalises
their absence, tries to deny the full range of
possible colours in the distribution of white
markings in the Azawakh. Thus, the standard
takes only the majority into account, excluding
a large number of specimens it should not
ignore, in order to emphasize the breed type
found in Europe. This also holds true for the
other colours and patterns which the standard
does not recognise.
Notwithstanding the fact that
this group of specimens exhibit colours and
patterns which are not recognised by the
standard, and represent a minority of the
Azawakh population, we should however include
them in the FCI standard. In fact, it is not
right that a breed standard recognises but a
portion of the colour varieties actually
possible. It would be more appropriate for the
standard to reflect the data gathered in the
countries of origin, and to report them
faithfully, as the Azawakh belongs to a strong,
ancient breed, which has established its history
and adapted itself to its environment. It is
basic to maintaining the authenticity of the
breed, because it is bound through the cultural
patrimony of its country of origin. In Europe,
fanciers should control breeding in order to
avoid selection aiming at the production of a
hyper-type suitable for the show ring; a trend
clearly visible in the recent past concerning
some eastern breeds. Of course, every standard
is simply a the description of an ideal
phenotype at a determined moment in time, and it
is in no way immutable.
But, if acknowledgement
concerning colour and markings remains too
limited, genetic stock will be reduced, and
consequently the risks linked to excessive blood
relationships will rise. The most recent annual
Azawakh Exhibition by the DWZRV (the German
Sighthound Club), with 55 specimens shown, was
an accurate mirror of the limited range of
colours in the European population which,
following an arbitrary selection aimed at a well
defined type, no longer represents the
multiplicity of colours which can be found in
the countries of origin.
TAB.3: distribution of colours in the azawakh
at the 1997 annual exhibition
|
Colori |
number |
% in the ring |
% found in country of origin |
|
Red |
38 |
69,10 |
44,84 |
|
Sable |
3 |
5,45 |
33,51 |
|
Brindle |
13 |
23,84 |
13,92 |
|
Cream |
1 |
1,81 |
1,37 |
|
Blaze |
3 |
5,45 |
12,89 |
|
Irish marked |
2 |
3,63
|
6,01 |
In order to safeguard the
breed and its authenticity in the years to come,
we can but hope that the variety and the genetic
richness within the Azawakh population will
rise, and this not only as colours are
concerned.
Thanks to the integration of
newly imported specimens to breeding programs,
the problems linked to excessive inbreeding may
be avoided. Moreover, a timely extension of the
standard to include the full range of documented
colours, as mentioned before, would be a
progressive step toward greater genetic
heterogeneity.
Epilogue
In order to sum up our data
gathered during the last two expeditions of the
ABIS, and to illustrate the general meaning of
the present article, here is chart 4 concerning
the specimens seen in 1996/97.
In 1997, we unfortunately
recorded 39 dogs less than the year before. This
can be explained by the fact that we had no
available time to visit Niger, and that
consequently only a very few Azawakh were
entered in this study, with the exception of
those met in transit from Anderamboukane to
Tera, via Banibangou, Ouallam and Tillaberi. The
regions we went through in Burkina Faso and Mali
confirmed our previous results.
TAB. 4: division of azawakhs according to the
origins of their owners
|
country |
nationality |
Number of dogs |
Tot. |
|
|
|
1996 |
1997 |
2000 |
|
|
Niger |
Haussa |
50 |
9 |
-
|
59 |
|
|
Tuareg |
19 |
10 |
-
|
29 |
|
|
Peulh |
-
|
9 |
-
|
9 |
|
|
Bella |
-
|
3 |
-
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mali |
Haussa |
1 |
-
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
Tuareg |
38 |
55 |
72 |
165 |
|
|
Peulh |
-
|
-
|
6 |
6 |
|
|
Bella |
5 |
-
|
22 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burkina Faso |
Haussa |
4 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
|
|
Tuareg |
6 |
8 |
18 |
32 |
|
|
Peulh |
21 |
31 |
20 |
72 |
|
|
Bella |
49 |
23 |
68 |
140 |
We spent more time in the
Azawakh Valley, and we met more people there
because of the return of the refugees, which
gave us the opportunity to record more
specimens. Table 5 gathers the Azawakh data
according to phenotype, following the FCI
standard's criteria.
Some puppies are entered in
Table 5's category of "not classified" because
of their young age.
We should also underscore
that in 1997 settled people owned Azawakhs, and
above all in the countries of origin. The great
percentage of Tuareg in Mali can be explained by
the fact that we met many nomad Tuareg in the
area we went through in the Azawakh valley.
Unfortunately, we still cannot report
information about populations based in other
regions of Mali, as they are domains which are
regarded as "annexed" to the areas which are the
cradle of the breed.
TAB.5: classification of the population
according to the phenotypical criteria of the
standard
|
|
1996 |
1997 |
2000 |
Tot. |
% |
|
Very typical |
85 |
75 |
91 |
251 |
43,13 |
|
typical |
18 |
50 |
72 |
207 |
35,56 |
|
Less typical |
18 |
8 |
17 |
43 |
7,39 |
|
Not classified |
16 |
32 |
33 |
81 |
13,92 |
|
Tot. |
|
|
|
582 |
100 |
|
Coarse tail |
18 |
11 |
36 |
65 |
11,17 |
|
Ear carriage incorrect |
6 |
13 |
39 |
58 |
9,97 |
|
Long coat hair |
5 |
10 |
31 |
46 |
7,90 |
|
Curled hair |
7 |
6 |
9 |
22 |
3,78 |
^
.
|